“core U.S. interests”

In a typically thoughtful and well-informed piece, Bret Stephens reminds us that we can lose in Afghanistan by talking with the Taliban. The analogy is how we lost in Vietnam, not on the battlefield, but by restraining our troops and, yes, talking with the enemy.

Stephens claims “we are in Afghanistan to defend core U.S. interests.” Presumably that includes destroying, or at least neutering, those who gave sanctuary and support to the 9/11 terrorists. That is, the Taliban. Stephens, correctly, notes

There’s one way—and only one way—the U.S. could get the Taliban to come to terms: a series of decisive military blows that give them no other option.

This is of course correct: nothing focuses the mind like a sound military defeat.

But two points: first, is it still in our “core interests” that we defeat the Taliban? Second, isn’t the only reason we would talk to the Taliban the political needs of Barack Hussein Obama? He’s already said that his primary concern vis a vis Afghanistan was losing the Democrat Party?

If we need to be in Afghanistan to defeat the Taliban so as to prevent another 9/11, then, by all means, let’s do so: defeat them. Not build a nation where none has ever been. If the Taliban no longer pose that kind of threat, then why are we in Afghanistan to begin with?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s